|
|
THE
ORIGINS OF THE WAR ON DRUGS: 1960-72
Societies
have traditionally withdrawn from restricting the use of substances using any
enforceable approach measures against citizens until the early 20th century when
communist countries became the first to introduce restrictions. During the Eisenhower
administration, no one would have even dared to utter such terms like, substance
abuse or a war on drugs. These utterances would have no doubt resulted in
accusations of communism. During the 1950s, the Soviet Union set the stage
for the war on drugs by restricting access to a laundry list of chemicals and
medications that it felt would arouse political dissent. In response to
this, the Eisenhower administration allowed the US to remain free of such
restrictions. As a result, drug use became increasingly prevalent during the period after
WWII such that the Kennedy administration proposed a program which
would have brought education into the classrooms and on television. Had
JFK survived to win a second term in office, it is very likely that a bill would
have been introduced to launch this process. The Johnson administration
overlooked such legislation and took no action to teach the American
public. Such action would have changed the course of history and the US
would have set the precedent required for a technologically advanced
civilization in a free world.
During
the 1960s, New New Journalism launched an ugly war between television and glossy
tabloids like Life and Look magazines. Vying for the same markets, these
media shaped our world more than anyone might imagine. For the first time in
history, cameras went directly into the front lines of the battlefield to
capture the realities of physical combat in Vietnam. Instead of war heroes making it to the cover of Life and Look as had
been the case during WWII and the Korean War, the images from the trenches were splashed on the cover of magazines.
Televised news carried film footage from the front lines of battle. The
public could finally see the brutalities of combat. It made no difference
whether the public was drawn to it or whether it was thrust upon them, magazine
sales went up and TV ratings increased. The success this produced led camera crews into American urban
areas, recording public reaction to the war. Initially staged events paved
the way for the mass population to exercise a rebellion that had been stirring
since JFK's assassination. Suddenly, America seemed to be a country on
fire with draft cards burning on college campuses, bra burning to herald the
women's movement; cars were on fire in Detroit, and even the American flag was
burning. Cameras recorded everything from the hippie culture to the
Stonewall Riots that introduced the gay movement. A rather liberal press was
flying in the face of the Nixon administration which was floundering in waves of
public criticism. US leadership suddenly was confronted with a leaking
faucet that had turned into an exploding dam that could not contain the
media. Coverage of the sexual revolution posed a threat to morality in the US. With the walls
coming down around them, the right wing conservatives were not clear in
understanding that what was actually transpiring was a natural evolution of the
media. However, in small town America and among families in urban areas,
the new form of media did not have the impact one might have thought. The mass
population was simply undergoing a long overdue cultural change and
eventually it would have adjusted as it always had. However, the media forced politicians to
take action to save their jobs and -- they thought -- to save their country.
Moralists
will say that the catalyst to action happened during the summer of 1969. On the
night after Judy Garland was found dead of a drug overdose in London, the gay
community in New York responded to the raids on the Stonewall Bar in Greenwich
Village by turning the barstools on the police. Those riots had been the first to spark a nationwide response
from homosexuals. To politicians this "perversion" was a threat
to the American culture as many speculated it could rise up to engulf the entire
population. Alfred Kinsey's shocking revelation in post WWII America
indicating that up to 90% of the population could easily abandon families for the carefree gay
lifestyle threatened the future of America, and by the end of that dreadful
summer, a massive example of that kind of threat was looming in the rain-soaked
hillside of New York farmland where the young generation of baby boomers were
gathering for a concert of orchestral disharmony, shedding their clothing and
wallowing in the mud like primitive wild animals that actually might be there to
attend some secret Satanic baptismal rite that would transcend restrictive
Christian thought to bring about free love, producing mass homosexual conversion
in what might be the end of marriage and the family. TV cameras rolled as
the White House joined Americans in horror only to open the tabloid after a
never-ending nightmare of bewitching and shameful acts not even imagined during
the days of Aleister Crowley or Salam, Massachusetts to find the face of Charlie
Manson whose evil smile cast a long black shadow over American beauty and a new
generation with the death of the pregnant Sharon Tate, the glamorous new doll of
Hollywood's royal brigade. A tug of war in the mudswamp of Bethel
Farms just outside Woodstock, NY became the generation's struggle with the devil
and a world that was spinning away from order and into anarchy.
Traditionally,
the trickle of societal misfits that expressed a twisted sexual camraderie for
members of their own gender were siphoned off by the Catholic priesthood where
they could reflect in a tortured life of celibacy or run off to a career on the
sea where they might live their naked frolic fantasy fun in isolation. No
one cared. The wise knew that the lives of explorers and spinsters and
those who chose careers beyond the home had some private personal meaning.
It was something that was known and overlooked. The wise knew that men who
entered the military never to leave might have some reasons that were beyond the
comprehension of the heterosexual human mind. So be it. It made no
headlines that James Buchanan, a president of the United States had lived his
life in secret with another man, a Senator. Bachelors lived together for
years as women tried to be the one who could turn them into a
family. But step by step, this was changing. The private matters
that one kept secret were suddenly being bared. A new way of communication
had forced its way from the street and into the home. What had been thought to be a rather small insignificant number was now out
of control.
During
the summer of 1969, the USA had conquered the moon, but the youth of the US had
been conquered by the devil. Even though the sexual revolution was a term coined about the climate of youth during
the 1920s during the advent of radio, television gave the sexual revolution
something to look at.
To
the conservatives, there was a reason why American youth had become unglued and
that's because they were probably sniffing it, glue that is. In other
words, the drugs were like modern day witchcraft. It had to be and something had to be
done about it. The conservatives felt they would be overrun by a society fueled
on cannabis, heroin, LSD, and hasish. The generation of baby boomers were flagging for open sexuality,
homosexuality, free love, and everywhere drugs were
accessible. Physicians were able to promote a smorgasboard of
"pleasure" drugs. People -- youth, the successors to the throne
-- were dying from overdoses, and it seemed
as though the land of freedom had turned into a land of debauchery. There
was a way to gain back the youth in modern society, but it was going to take
time. It would not happen overnight; it would not take weeks or even
months but years, and even decades to see the outcome of their labors, but the
group decided that they would be committed... they would be persistent... and
they would bring back the values of Christianity under which America was
founded. They
would unite and work to strengthen every family in America one by one. So,
they rolled up their sleeves, made some calculated decisions, and soon they
began implementing strategies to retain a better world -- that is, a world that
was better for them. They agreed the central theme
would be a war against drugs, but they would augment various factions to impede
such societal adversities like homosexuality. Without really knowing
what Pandora's Box they were opening, they decided to turn a free nation into
one in which they had control. To many who were politically conservative,
morally repressive, and theologically absorbed, the foundation of the
nation they were recreating was sound, strong, and secure. But underneath
this logical solution, there was death, AIDS, repression, incarceration, and a
total misunderstanding of human nature that we cannot see clearly, even now,
because we are hovering in the midst of it.
It
should always be remembered that the religious force behind this movement was
Christianity. But what the veteran generation failed to recognize for some
time, was that these values of love, peace, and concern for others were rooted
firmly on the other side of the generation gap. There was no need for
alarm. But then again, Christianity has nothing to do with Jesus
Christ. In the modern definition of the word, Christianity means
Capitalism.
In
the New Testament of the Judea-Christian Bible, Christ
loves everyone, embraces everyone, except for one class of people. The
only time that Jesus Christ ever lashed out was at the wealthy merchants
who made a mockery of God by turning the Church into a trading hall. In
fact, outside the US, there are many who praise those who flew planes into the
World Trade Center as a symbolism of core Christianity on a larger scale. Ironically, Christians
in the US keep searching for Christ's condemnation of
homosexuality, when it is the wealthy capitalist that would have enraged Christ to
violence as it had.
Was
the drug war ever a logical solution? NO! In 1971, it only seemed like a
logical decision to start an irrational civil war. When you think about
it, it is preposterous that a nation that had worked for 100 years to become
united, was now tearing itself apart again with another war against itself. In
2007, the war on drugs only shows that the US cannot deal with evolution.
And on this day, June 17, 2007, to celebrate the 36th anniversary of the war on
drugs is the most disgraceful blow to our society for it is nothing but a cloud
of smoke under which this country hides it's bitter prejudice and
mistrust. In the US, we have achieved a well-deserved title, we are the
country that harbors the anti-Christ and we prove it more and more every
day. For the shame is now on all of the US, misfits of the world. As
one foreign student recently told the press: "My father begged me not to
come to this country. He was so afraid that if I came here, he would never
see me again. I have been back twice to see him and each time, his health is
worse. He prays for me. He prays everyday. I finished my last
(college) exam today and have a ticket to fly home tonight. I won't be
back. I love my father too much to return here... The one thing I find
disturbing about this country (the US) is that it has a distorted view of
freedom. It doesn't teach its people how to live. It allows
people freedom to live as they want until they make a mistake and get caught,
and then they spend the rest of their lives paying for it."
|