|
I
did not create this website as an endorsement for drugs. Considering that
the 2005 United Nations World Drug Report put the retail value of the
illicit drug trade at $322 billion to $400 billion with the licit drug
market valued just under $1 trillion, the drug industry doesn't need a
promotion. Drugs sell themselves. I devised this website
because there are an estimated 19.6 million people in the U.S. who use
illicit drugs. Those who use drugs routinely are often
self-medicating a legitimate medical disorder that has either been
undiagnosed or diagnosed but left untreated. In the 21st
century, only a small fraction of illicit drug users are consuming
drugs for "recreational" purposes. Hence, the war on drugs
(WOD) is really a war on a health care system in the U.S. that was ranked
at number 38 by the United Nations World Health Organization (WHO) in
2000. Since people are dependent upon that health care system, the
WOD, according to George Soros, is really a war on people.
Those who use drugs -- illicit or
prescription -- for "recreational" purposes, generally do
so occasionally. Therefore, the sales from illicit drugs for
recreational purposes is speculatively so small that the illicit drug
industry probably could not sustain itself without self-medicators.
While the tactics of the WOD have reached "recreational" drug
users, it has not decreased the use of illicit drugs, but has increased
abuse by not providing proper education. If there is a gateway
to drug abuse, it comes from classes like Substance Abuse Education
which is like taking Drowning Lessons instead of Swimming
Lessons or like Motor Vehicle Accident Education rather than Motor
Vehicle Safety Education.
In the 21st century, the U.S. Government
now targets those with legitimate chronic medical disorders that require
continuous treatment with a controlled substance. Without treatment,
many of them are unable to be gainfully employed, thus, they have
become disabled. Others have become dependant on the illicit drug market for a solution.
Since states started adopting the Prescription Monitoring Program (PMP),
writing a prescription for a Schedule II-IV drug is like signing an
agreement to a lengthy prison term. Today, a simple visit with a
healthcare provider can result in the end of a career that may not have
even started.
In 2004, I first presented my argument to Senator Dianne
Feinstein (CA). Senator Feinstein did not respond to me until 2008,
when she agreed with me, planning to take my message before the
Subcommittee on Crime and Drugs. You have to understand what it
means when a health care issue is brought before a Committee that deals
with crime. It turns health care into a crime. I realize there
are many people who feel that health care in the U.S. is already a
crime. Regardless of what anyone believes, there are many good
people working in health care. Unfortunately, they are not always
the ones who get the glory. They are usually among those who are
victimized by government standards.
There's one thing I want you to remember, even if you
forget about this website and strongly disagree with it, you have to know
that the drug war is not about protecting youth in America or anywhere
else.. You must remember that because the WOD costs
tax payers $70 billion dollars a year when the budget for education is
just a small fraction of that. If it was true that the WOD was about
saving youth, gasoline and household products would
have been added to the list of controlled substances 40 years ago.
Guess what. They are still not on the list of controlled substances.
|
|
The problem with the war on drugs is just
starting to become pervasive. To understand it more clearly, we turn to
history. At the beginning of the Paleolithic Age -- also known as
the Old Stone Age -- 2.5 million years ago, our ancestors began shaping
tools out of stone. Primitive as they were, they knew about fire
because fire resulted during an electrical storm when lightening touched
ground, burning out acres of area. Humanity had the knowledge to cut
flint rock into arrows and should have been able to recognize the value of
fire. However, it would take about 500,000 years until humanity was
able to control fire, and another 500,000 years before there is any
evidence that humanity used fire as a way to transform one substance into
something more useful. The probable reason why it took our
ancestors that long to harness fire was due to fear. It was the same
fear that stopped the application of electricity during ancient Greece,
and the same fear that grounded Leonardo DiVinci's attempts to design an
airplane. Humans hid beneath the shelter of religion, fearing to
face what was hard to believe, and believing instead, something that was
easier to comprehend.
Queen Isabella of Argon was perhaps the
catalyst of change when she funded the westward voyage of Christopher
Columbus that would supposedly place him in the East. The New World
had a strong influence on Europe. It brought an end to
feudalism. By the 18th century, science was no longer regarded as
sorcery, and as a result, electricity emerged and new discoveries in
chemistry came about, forming the foundation of the Industrial
Revolution.
On May 1, 1851, Queen Victoria and Prince
Albert opened the Great Exposition in a 990,000 sq ft structure made of
glass and iron known as the Crystal Palace, in which over 14,000
exhibitors demonstrated their inventions. This event
officially set the stage for dawn of the Electro-Chemical Age and the
Anthropocene Epoch. For the next 100 years, inventions
abounded. Then during the early 1960s, it was becoming evident that
along with the glory of inventions, there came a backlash of negative
fallout as corporations produced enough pollution to have an impact on the
environment. But rather than destroying corporations,
or banning cars, humanity fixed the problems, educated people how to drive
and operate machinery from mechanical farm tools to sophisticated
computers. On the other hand, no such protocol developed in
pharmacology. There was no education; there was war.
Abstinence is not an option for those who suffer from lifelong chronic
medical disorders. It places our health care system directly in the
line of fire. Without equality in health care, can there really be
equality elsewhere for those with disorders? Are we saying, all people are
equal except those with medical disorders who cannot receive health care
because to treat the illness the patient requires a controlled substance
that a provider finds it easier to sign a patient onto Social Security
Disability Insurance (SSDI) benefits than to write a prescription for a
controlled substance? There are people with cataplexy in our society
who cannot get the medication, sodium oxybate (Xyrem) that is the only
drug which can treat cataplexy. With cataplexy, a person is prone to
falling down when they experience a certain emotion, such as laughter or
excitement. It is dangerous and debilitating. But because
sodium oxybate is gamma-hydroxybutyrate (GHB) not everyone can get
treated for the disorder. Thus the next Albert Einstein may never
get a chance in the U.S. if there is no provider willing to prescribe the
right medication. That says a great deal about our society.
There are many ways to overcome the
problem, but only one way will work. If we give every K12 student
the knowledge and the discipline to use drugs safely, the responsibility
will no longer fall on the shoulders of our health care providers.
The trust will be in the individual. Regardless of race, ethnicity,
sexual orientation, gender, or whatever discriminating criteria a provider
may choose, the responsibility will be in the hands of the educated
patient. When everyone who seeks health care is able to obtain it,
that will be the beginning of the end of the drug problem. The only
way to achieve that is to give the people the education they need to
address routine illness themselves. This is the goal of the Drug
Use Education Process Initiative.
|
|