Irrevocable
Damage
to
Healthcare in the US as a Result of the War on Drugs
by
Richard Gicomeng
Two
of the many devastating aspects of the war on drugs are associated
with the pronounced effect it has on employment and in the
healthcare of those undergoing treatment for chronic disorders
requiring the use of a controlled substance. No matter if the
disorder has been proven to be legitimate, backed by testing which
specifically proves that there are no alternative treatments
available which are acceptable, physicians can and have lost their
license to practice based on federal laws which are supposedly there
to protect the patient. Instead, these laws spawning from the
war on drugs and zero tolerance have endangered the lives of
otherwise healthy individuals in productive jobs by making treatment
inaccessible. Among this category are the 45 million adult
Americans suffering from ADD/ADHD, several million others who suffer
from narcolepsy and cataplexy, and up to 19 million others who
endure obesity and cannot benefit from alternative treatment.
While
legal loopholes have enabled some physicians to prescribe controlled
substances for those not among "high risk" groups, those
in the African American, Latino, and gay bi and lesbian (LGBT)
communities have become permanently disabled. To cope with
everyday living, these groups have been led by health educators to
use illicit substances to treat their disorder.
Cancer
victims represent the largest group discriminated against with more
than 95 million American suffering from cancer radiation therapy
unable to obtain medical marijuana during recovery.
The
degradation of the healthcare industry in America has had a
pronounced effect on survival, with patients forced to become
homeless.
Perhaps
the most ridiculous thing that happened to healthcare was the War on
Drugs that initially was aimed at preventing citizens from the evils
of two main drugs: cannabis and heroin, but it also applied to other
illicit drugs such as LSD, MDA, and so forth. Cocaine,
ketamine, GHB methamphetamine, and a laundry list of prescription
and illicit psychostimulants were not even considered on June 17,
1971 when President Nixon marked his legacy with another grim
reminder that the conservative base (aka the vast right wing
conspiracy) seeks to divide our nation rather than unite it.
The
public still doesn't realize just how much the government is a
controlling part of healthcare, the chemicals that we breathe, and
even the manufacturing of illicit drugs that are purchased from the
streets, what senators like Hillary Clinton, Diane Feinstein,
Barbara Boxer, Ben Cardin
Sherrod
Brown, Robert Corker, Sheldon Whitehouse, Robert Casey, Jon Tester,
Jim Webb, Bernie Sanders, Claire McCaskill, Amy Klobuchar, Barack
Obama, Robert Menendez, Chuck Schumer, and all the others know about
drugs is less than the chemists, drug dealers, pharmacologists,
research physicians, and patient care physicians, and what these
people know about drugs is practically nothing.
The
truth is that no one that has ever breathed the air on this planet
knows enough about chemical substances, because if they did, they
probably would be more concerned about the toxicity in the air than
about the side effects of substances that are consumed freely by
members of society.
|
During
the early days of the AIDS pandemic, public outcries for help went
unheard in the Reagan White House. Many of those
diagnosed with HIV/AIDS scrambled for answers that were slow to come
from the pool of research that was being conducted by the government
with the Center for Disease Control (CDC) monitoring and reporting
the staggering numbers of AIDS-related mortality and
morbidity. A lack of answers severed many with AIDS from
the bond of a traditional physician-patient partnership. Using the
resources of their peers, PWAs were discovering the benefits of
self-medicating with illicit drugs such as cannabis and
methamphetamine. The near-term benefits of cannabis became
apparent for those recovering from AIDS-related and non-AIDS related
cancer. For those self-medicating with crystal
methamphetamine, many found it easier to cope with depression,
fatigue, and mental anxiety. CMA brought about a sense of
well-being to those who were sick, and gave users motivation.
Overdosing on CMA in the near term created a sense of euphoria that
led to isolation. In the long-term, many who had used
doses in moderation were still living after 10 years or more with
the disease. Meanwhile, physicians were losing ground.
CMA became targeted as a catalyst causing the emergence of
HIV. Proponents of CMA claim that those who use the drug -- or
any illicit drug -- are risk takers who also engage in unsafe
sex. However, opponents of CMA merely see that any individual
who uses CMA will engage in risky behavior as a result of mental
impairment.
In 2007, little more is known about
the drug because all of the research has been blind-sighted,
focusing on the negative side effects of the drug rather than on the
benefits. Indeed, the war on drugs has enabled drug dealers
and suppliers the opportunity to become more proficient with the
drug than those members of the healthcare community that condemn the
use of it. This has led to protocols which harm rather than
help HIV/AIDS patients.
Finding
Good Healthcare |
The
Internet has made it easy to find any type of service or
product. A few hours of research can easily lead someone
into making a sound decision on purchasing even the most
complex electronics equipment they know nothing about.
Plumbers, attorneys, tax accountants, and others are often
rated for their performance. However, finding a
healthcare provider (HCP) that meets the needs of the
individual is remarkably difficult. Yes, there are
plenty of online websites that list physicians along with
their specialization, address, and reviews made by
patients. Some charge for services and others are
free. You can even "backdoor" your way into a
site that typically charges by finding another website that
provides free access.
The problem
is that finding a good provider is a subjective task.
Just when you think you've found someone you think you'll
like, they don't take your insurance. You can always
tell who the real good HCPs are because when you call to make
an appointment, they aren't accepting new patients. So
they refer you to someone else who refers you to someone
else... until finally, you find yourself in the office of
someone who doesn't meet up to your standards. The
problem of finding really good healthcare is becoming an
enormous problem. Part of the reason is that the medical
profession isn't what it used to be. There was a time
when just about any physician had to be good. There were
more dedicated hard-working physicians who could resolve your
medical problems right from primary care. Today, a
primary care physician is likely to be a business major who
went to medical school for the prestige. He or she will
refer most of your medical complaints to various specialists,
and still charge you an arm and a leg for a visit in which
nothing was accomplished other than referrals.
It doesn't
always help to heed the reviews of physicians because they
might have different and very superficial reasons for liking
or disliking an HCP that doesn't concern you. If you go
to a doctor you don't like, it's not that easy to walk
away. Healthcare insurance won't pay for you to
interview physicians. Of course, the real test of
finding good healthcare involves reading your medical
records. HCPs can be gratifying to your ego, but when
you review your MRs, they can block the door to your future
with just a few words.
The best way
to obtain good healthcare is to spend time at local hospitals
talking to staff and patients. Network with friends and
associates and get them to reveal who their physician is and
if they like the physician, ask them in great detail
why. Find out if they have seen their MRs, most patients
aren't concerned with MRs, especially those who don't have
chronic medical disorders. If a doctor is not accepting
new patients, go on a waiting list. Push your way into
the practice of a doctor who has a great reputation but
doesn't have time for new patients.
In the
future, it will more important for individuals to have a
serious amount of medical knowledge. Until then, finding
an honest and compassionate HCP is a job unto itself. Take the
time to look for a physician that's worthy of your time.
If you stumble on one that meets your needs adequately, don't
let it slip through your fingers. Good doctors are hard
to find.
|
|
|